In my previous school district, I was the only teacher teaching a physics course with set, district-wide learning outcomes. These same outcomes were also taught in physics classrooms at the other high school in our district. But at our school, I was one of the 2 physics teachers. The other teacher taught the AP-level physics courses. So, in many ways, I had opportunities to incorporate strategies I believed were best for learners and that I found worked best for them without being seen as out of alignment with anyone in our building. My amazing friend and one of my teaching philosophy goddesses, Katie Novak, stated the following misconception about alignment: All teachers must deliver instruction in the exact same way. True alignment, she says, is about shared goals, rigor, and outcomes. Thank you, Katie! Katie has taught me to truly believe that learner variability is the rule, not the exception. I encourage you to take 10 minutes to listen to Katie Novak explain it in the ...
When I looked at my first set of AP Physics 1 video projects on momentum, I thought they were very good. Groups took them into some very unexpected and interesting places. I'll share more examples in future posts as the inspiration strikes me. This project in particular struck me because in it I saw the seeds for something greater. In this project, I saw the possibilities for tying together seemingly desperate content areas such as physics, art, and history.
Watch it and hopefully you'll see what I mean:
I realized that all of my students showed great ambition in their projects. They all took risks both emotionally (acting like a fool because the script called for it) to physical (playing simulating collisions while riding in trash cans and tacking each other in the snow.) It was me who lacked the real ambition to try to find the ways that this project could truly bring in standards from other content areas. I can just imagine this video becoming so much more if I had asked the group to include more of a historical framework for the project after an initial viewing. Why not also tie in standards from the visual arts as well? The only reason, is my fear of failure. If I am asking my students to take risks as they design and create their projects, why am I not doing the same in the design of what they are asked to learn? Alright, I'm going to have to do some serious research into other content standards to incorporate. I will see how they did on these standards, but these scores won't be a part of the grade. I have to start somewhere. I already tie in literacy standards into my projects, but what about other areas? Any ideas of a good place start looking for standards in other content areas for the high school level?
Watch it and hopefully you'll see what I mean:
I realized that all of my students showed great ambition in their projects. They all took risks both emotionally (acting like a fool because the script called for it) to physical (playing simulating collisions while riding in trash cans and tacking each other in the snow.) It was me who lacked the real ambition to try to find the ways that this project could truly bring in standards from other content areas. I can just imagine this video becoming so much more if I had asked the group to include more of a historical framework for the project after an initial viewing. Why not also tie in standards from the visual arts as well? The only reason, is my fear of failure. If I am asking my students to take risks as they design and create their projects, why am I not doing the same in the design of what they are asked to learn? Alright, I'm going to have to do some serious research into other content standards to incorporate. I will see how they did on these standards, but these scores won't be a part of the grade. I have to start somewhere. I already tie in literacy standards into my projects, but what about other areas? Any ideas of a good place start looking for standards in other content areas for the high school level?
Comments
Post a Comment