Skip to main content

Let It Go Part 1

In an attempt to get my thoughts out there on some things I have had to let go in reforming my instructional design, I wanted to put together a series of short  posts about what I had to let go of.

This is where I would put in a clip from Frozen. But, I think we all know that song by now.

Due dates are a very important guide for making sure that students complete work in a timely fashion.  At the end of most units of instruction, there is a summative assessment. That assessment is either held on a specific date if it is a test or has a due date if it is some other form of assessment like a project or student generated document.

Most teachers  have class planers with dates for tests and due dates for homework and other assignments.  The problem comes when students don't meet a due date or don't perform their best on a test.  The date for the end of the unit was a date chooses by the teacher based upon the pacing of a unit.  There are a lot of teachers who use formative instruction to drive their curriculum. These teachers have a better idea where their students are.  But that doesn't mean that all students were prepared for the assessment.  If they cannot demonstrate mastery on the date chosen by the teacher, every student should have the opportunity to demonstrate his or her ability to meet the learning outcomes of the assessment at a later date even if that means multiple attempts.  The real work is how do we remediate instruction and get those students to mastery.

In reality, the only true hard line due date is the end of the course. A student is expected to demonstrate mastery by the end of the course not a specific date within the course designated by the instructor.  All of our students learn at a different paces. So, we can't set single dates as the one date where all students should be able to demonstrate mastery.  It is an unrealistic and flawed model.

For those that do administer end of unit tests, it's important that all students have the opportunity to improve on their score.
In classrooms where students have the option to take a traditional test, students should be allowed the chance to demonstrate growth and mastery if they failed to on any attempt.

 In most classes I have seen, the ability to meet teacher assigned deadlines is not a learning objective. So, it should not be something that factors into our assessments. So, students should not be punished for late work.

I understand that this may seem like a radical idea. I don't have all the answers. But the first step is realizing the flaws in the current model and letting it go.

Popular posts from this blog

Waves of Innovation in Elmbrook Part 1

As a part of a graduate project, I am looking at innovations in education within my school district, Elmbrook Schools. I am specifically focusing on those looking to provide learners with more ownership over their own learning (a.k.a. personalizing learning). I've completed 4 interviews so far.  I had no intention of sharing them via this blog.  But, I think the stories and insights of these educators really are important for all.  They were vulnerable in a way that shows their passion for what they are undertaking.  They want the best for all learners not simply students, but educators who may hear their words.  So, please take the time to listen to their stories.  


In this video, Jeff Ortman a teacher in his 22nd year, discusses implementing strategies to give students ownership of their learning in his high school English classroom.  He discusses why he wanted to change his learning environment, his first steps to bring change, how choice and feedback are key to his classroom, a…

Can I Believe These Numbers?

Our union put out the results of a recent district survey.  The number of those who responded to the survey was low in comparison to the total number of certified staff. But the number and comments related to personalized learning struck me as troubling.


Based on this data, over half of the district staff polled are not onboard with the district's vision for personalized learning.  I would argue that not knowing the district vision for personalized learning is synonymous with not understanding what personalized learning is. The mission of the Elmbrook School Districtto inspire every student to think, to learn and to succeed.  By personalizing learning, we hope to achieve that mission.
I begin to question have we put the phrase before the meaning?  Have we thrown out this word without intention?  Have we made it to much of another thing to do rather than a method to achieve our shared vision.
These numbers shake me to the core.  After the recent presidential election, I realized I was…

How to Personalize Learning Part 3: Knowing How a Classroom Learns

Now, it may seem contradictory to state that teachers should create a classroom learner toolkit.  All individuals in our class have their own profile. We can’t simply design on blanket profile for the class.  That is very true.  That’s why Bray and McClaskey take a different approach to what a classroom learning toolkit looks like.  It is a 3-step process Class Learning Snapshot Preferences and Needs Class Learning Toolkit

Class Learning Snapshot In this model of designing tools for a whole classroom, the authors first recommend the teacher identify 4 learners who are diverse.  The Class Learning Snapshot records the specific strengths, talents, interests, and challenges of those four learners. If a teacher could meet the needs of these diverse learners through UDL, the needs of the other students in the class would probably be met.

Student Strengths, Talents, and Interests Challenges 1 It's easier for me to understand content when I am taught by a teacher and then am able to get informati…