After 20 years of teaching at Brookfield Central, I am saying goodbye. Although I spent the majority of that time in the physics classroom alongside my learners. That changed for my last 18 weeks. I ended up in a place similar to where I started, teaching chemistry and biology. So, rather than dealing with juniors and seniors at the end of their high school careers, I was in classrooms with freshmen and sophomores still trying to find their place. At the same time, I was learning and teaching a set curriculum I hadn't taught in over a decade. So, we were learning. But, of course, I already knew the content. The point of this post is to take a step back, reflect, and share the gratitude from the last students I had in my 20 years at Brookfield Central High School, as expressed through the cards and notes they made for me on my last day with them. I don't take many "yay me" moments. But after 20 years, I'll soak this one in.
This post is part 2 of my constellation construction. Read part 1 here.
Once I had a vision for my classroom, or the why for my classroom, the next step was to consider what it would look like in the classroom. The Institute calls these “learner look fors”. I have a vision, but what evidence would I look for from a the perspective of an outside observer.
- Students propose and engage in different forms of learning- modes, methods- based on their needs
- Students' interests and strengths drive their connection to the content
- Feedback drives next steps of learning and conferring is happening face to face and digitally
The vision and look fors are things we are working towards. The next part of the “what” is what elements would be considered key parts achieving that vision in my classroom.
After determining the “look fors”the next step is to find elements that align with the look fors. The honeycomb has many elements that are considered part of a learner centered ecosystem. With nearly 40 identified elements in 4 different focal spheres, no classroom model can intentionally focus on all. So as a part of the process, I was asked to focus on the essential elements to my vision from the different levels. Those levels are:
- Students propose and engage in different forms of learning- modes, methods- based on their needs
- Students' interests and strengths drive their connection to the content
- Feedback drives next steps of learning and conferring is happening face to face and digitally
Before choosing the elements, one really needs to understand what they entail. From the Interactive Honeycomb one can get more information on what an element entails, including resources for implementation. A key to this step is thinking intentionally and not overextending the vision.
After elements were chosen, I was asked to think about how they connected in my mind to build a physical representation, a constellation of elements. I'll address how they are connected in the next post.
Before thinking about how an element will be implemented, the teacher really needs to understand what each element entails. Once identifying the elements, the teacher needs to understand what the element entails. I was asked to reflect on my current level of understanding of each element. This is where the resources from the Institute come into play. For each element they have rich pages that address why the element is important, what the element entails, and resources that address how educators can implement practices related to the element.
This is really important to understand. Before you can design how to implement a practice, you need to know what it is. It's not enough to choose elements to implement, educators need to know what the practices entail before looking at how to implement.
Comments
Post a Comment