After 20 years of teaching at Brookfield Central, I am saying goodbye. Although I spent the majority of that time in the physics classroom alongside my learners. That changed for my last 18 weeks. I ended up in a place similar to where I started, teaching chemistry and biology. So, rather than dealing with juniors and seniors at the end of their high school careers, I was in classrooms with freshmen and sophomores still trying to find their place. At the same time, I was learning and teaching a set curriculum I hadn't taught in over a decade. So, we were learning. But, of course, I already knew the content. The point of this post is to take a step back, reflect, and share the gratitude from the last students I had in my 20 years at Brookfield Central High School, as expressed through the cards and notes they made for me on my last day with them. I don't take many "yay me" moments. But after 20 years, I'll soak this one in.
At a recent school PD session, it was announced that we will be revisiting grading practices in an effort to come to agreement on common practices as a staff. I admire our administration for taking on this issue. Grading practices are something that most staff don’t like having open conversations about, myself included. I feel like I always need to be able to defend my position and I should be. So, the point of this post is to help me frame my beliefs as it comes to opportunities for students to receive feedback and act on that feedback. This diagram below is an attempt to summarize the process I allow students in my classroom when it comes to a particular learning outcome. I recently revised my objective rubrics to follow a 0-4 scale based on Bloom’s Taxonomy verbs. 4 Synthesize multiple pieces 3 Analyze unique information 2 Apply understanding 1 Explain basics The key to this process is providing students feedback and ...