In my previous school district, I was the only teacher teaching a physics course with set, district-wide learning outcomes. These same outcomes were also taught in physics classrooms at the other high school in our district. But at our school, I was one of the 2 physics teachers. The other teacher taught the AP-level physics courses. So, in many ways, I had opportunities to incorporate strategies I believed were best for learners and that I found worked best for them without being seen as out of alignment with anyone in our building. My amazing friend and one of my teaching philosophy goddesses, Katie Novak, stated the following misconception about alignment: All teachers must deliver instruction in the exact same way. True alignment, she says, is about shared goals, rigor, and outcomes. Thank you, Katie! Katie has taught me to truly believe that learner variability is the rule, not the exception. I encourage you to take 10 minutes to listen to Katie Novak explain it in the ...
Our driving question was "How can I use physics to hack sports?" So the intention was for students to make a connect between physics and a sport of their choice. When given voice in the topic that they would cover, students gravitated to sports which played a major role in their lives, sports they were passionate about.
The result is a product which doesn't simply tie physics to sport. It ties physics to something the student is passionate about. So, although the video tells us about physics and sport, it tells us just as much about the student. It's a beautiful realization I never thought I'd see, but it is powerful.
As a science teacher, the traditional approach to a lab report creates a distance between the author and the data. A product like this does just the opposite. It shows how we live in a world governed by natural laws and why we need to understand them. The student who created this video is Danyell Chupp. If you enjoy her video, I'd encourage giving her a shout out on Twitter @danyellchupp.

Comments
Post a Comment