Skip to main content

Less Physics Mo Problems

Why am I writing this personal entry? Well, it is not an attempt to gain any sympathy. It attempts to show what is possible if a clear intention and goal serve the learner's needs.  In May of 2022 just near the end of another fantastic school year, I do not remember what happened. But, I was unable to finish the school year and was unable to teach the following year.  Why? On May 21st, 2022, I fell down a flight of 16 stairs (luckily carpeted) from the 2nd to 1st story of our home.  I was found at the bottom of the stairs. I was found foaming at the mouth. This would lead to a 2-month hospital stay which included an induced coma because my seizures would not stop, several rounds of lumbar punctures, and relearning basic physical movements like something as simple as being able to roll in the hospital bed. Simply put, when I was admitted to the hospital, I was diagnosed as being “critically ill.” Please take a moment and read those words: critically ill. They are not terms that are

Habits of Mind Matter


I remember a few year ago the mantra at our school was that you can’t grade “behaviors”. What that translated into is all assessments only addressed content specific standards. What message does that send to our learners about what we value in them and what we want them to become? While the goal was to not put a grade on things like “completion of homework”, the result was assessments which only looked at part of the student as learner at not at habits of mind that are essential to creating learners.

In Students at the Center, Bena Kallick and Allison Zmuda ask us to make habits of mind an explicit part of our instruction in order to shape learners who focus on learning rather than being assessed. In their book, they find the connections between Personalized Learning and Habits of Mind in the classroom. The goal of this work is to show how habits of mind (“soft skills” or learner dispositions) are not things that live on the side of learning, but are essential to creating lifelong learners.

To that end, the authors define 16 habits of mind key to success. I won’t worry about defining them here, that is the work of the text and why you need to dig into it.  By just looking at the list, I think we can easily see that they are essential to achieving success regardless of context.


When curriculum focuses simply on the defined standards of the course, habits of mind fall to the side. This is not to say that course standards are not important. They are what drive the learning in our classroom. All learning in our classes begin with the course standards. Standards, though, are written from a discipline perspective and measure the end point of learning.  This means they don’t address learner dispositions. So when we simply address the standards, we may miss the components essential to growing learners.

I'm going to step back for a second and say that not all content standards are written like this, but the majority I have dealt with in the past have been. I do think that in some respects there is a slight shift occurring. My district is currently beginning to align our science curriculum K-12 to the Next Generation Science Standards. As I look at the Next Generation Science Standards, they have a focus on specific science practices. Some of these practices directly align to several habits of mind. I hope to return with a specific reflection looking at NGSS through the lens of Habits of Mind. For those dispositions that are embedded, how they can be made explicit? For those not embedded, how can they be married to the standards?

I’m sure every educator introduces relevant standards to learners at the beginning of a unit but how many students understand them.  Educators spend tons of PD hours unpacking standards just to understand them and find a way to frame them for learners.  In fact this summer, science teachers in our district are spending many hours translating Next Generation Science Standards into learner friendly learning targets. These habits of mind should no longer be the hidden curriculum, but an intentional part of our instruction.

Kallick and Zmuda make it clear we need to move from a standards view to a competencies view to help prioritize these habits of mind.  Competencies are written with an eye to these learner dispositions or habits of mind. While standards focus on creating experts in a field of study, competencies focus on creating experts in learning and problem solving. Competencies are written in language that can be understood clearly by all stakeholders. Standards, because they are written by experts in the field of study, can be difficult to decipher by those not already versed in the field.

Chapter 3 of the book looks specifically at student and teacher goal setting.  I look forward to reflecting more on those ideas as I continue reading and the work of the alignment process.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Twitter Cards for Blogger

So, I’ve been seeing people with beautiful Twitter Cards in my Twitter Stream. They make it clear that there is a web page to visit and give a quick preview of what would be found. Something like the one below: I’ve been wondering how to get one of the cards to appear when I tweet out a link to my latest blog post.  Since I use Blogger, there is not a simple button to click to turn this on.  I had to find a way to paste new code into the HTML code of my blog.  It took some searching from multiple sites to get a completely functional.   This site though was quite helpful.  But, I’d like to walk you through my process and hopefully it helps a few out. There are a few types of Twitter Cards.  Two that at most frequently see are the basic summary card and the summary card with large image.  Below you can see the layout of each, but realize that they both have the same content pieces. This is going to look like a lot more work than it will actually be

Personalized Learning Tasks and Roles

Yesterday, I read a great post by Jim Rickabaugh dealing with the roles of learner and teacher in a personalized learning environment by looking at tasks . The roles were set up on a continuum. This article timed perfectly with a reflection on part of Students at the Center by Allison Zmuda and Bena Kallick on idea generation and task development I had in mind. These two works are the focus of my reflection here. I think a key misunderstand teachers have when it comes to digging into personalizing learning is that for planning purposes, we no longer begin with standards but with student desires.  I believe like all good instruction, we need to start with the standards.  Think about it, standards are what we want all learners to know and be able to do as a result of passing through our educational system. That is why it is essential that we make sure that standards are representative of what we believe is important for learners to be informed and productive in their futur

Pear Deck 101 + Q&A

  Last week, I presented as a part of Pear Deck’s Pear Fair 2020. My presentation was Pear Deck 101 for Google Slides. During the presentation, there was a live chat. Many people said it went too fast for a 101 Session. Luckily, it was recorded so it can be rewatched.  Also, many said that they wanted to know how to build a Pear Deck first. I structured the presentation to show what Pear Deck was before showing how to make one. Perhaps that wasn’t the best structure. But, I’m going to stick with my philosophy of showing what something is before showing how to make it. The presentation, which can be watched below, was structured in several different sections What is Pear Deck? Providing an overview of the experience from the Teacher and Student perspectives. How do you build a Pear Deck in Google Slides? How do you start a Pear Deck presentation? How do you end a Pear Deck presentation? Here is the Slideshow I shared during the session bit.ly/pearfair101 Time really flew in the sess