Skip to main content

Generate Instant Pear Decks

By
  I’ll keep this short as the video explains most of you. Any new educational technology can be complicated to dig into from scratch as you attempt to align it to learning outcomes.  Well, a new feature that Pear Deck has introduced has taken a giant leap forward to help educators do just that.  Before we jump into the new features, if you are unfamiliar with Pear Deck and why my students and I consider it the #1 EdTech tool that helps their learning, check out the video in the previous blog post.   But if you are more concerned with why you should even dive into Pear Deck or learn about this new AI generation of Pear Deck sessions to a learning target, check out the video below. Like I said, I’m keeping it short so you have time to watch the video. If you have questions, please contact me at mohammam@elmbrookschools.org or the Pear Deck Learning team at support@deck.peardeck.com . Also, check out the amazing Stacey Roshan's video on this update. 
Post a Comment

Mo Physics Mo Problems

Image
By


As a teacher I like to think of myself as someone who values the process of problem solving rather than the right answer.  But, when I look at the majority of problem sets I assign my students, they simply focus on an getting the right answer. The problems ask only about the end without highlighting the thinking that goes into it.
When I think about all the work we do in our literacy training of analyzing a prompt, that work goes out the window when I give a student a calculation. I am always frustrated when students simply write down an answer to a complex problem without showing the work that went into it. But, I've come to realize that's what my practice problems have trained them to do.

Basically, I've been asking the wrong questions this whole time.

So, I'm rewriting my problems to force students to think through the process and respond.
As a physics teacher, we have a number of formulas that students must choose from to solve a specific problem. What I've found is that students don't have issues plugging numbers into a formula.  The problem comes with figuring out the formula to use for the situation.  Ultimately, that is the understanding I want them to have. I want them to be able to look at a situation and understand which tool to apply to that situation in order to solve it.

For my practice problems, we use a learning management system which autocorrects.  So the majority of the work we do for practice problems is with multiple choice or numerical responses.  So, it is up to me to break down the problems to very intentional chunks to force students to go through the thought process that is often taken for granted.  I’m not looking for students to simply plug and chug. I want them to be able to analyze the information given and choose the best way to solve the problem based on the information present.

Here’s an example of a problem I’ve given in the past:
1) The time it takes a car to attain a speed of 30 m/s when accelerating from rest at 2 m/s2 is      
A) 60 s.
B) 15 s.
C) 30 s.
D) 2 s.
I’ve expanded it into some basic steps to make the process visible:
1) A car to attain a speed of 30 m/s when accelerating from rest at 2 m/s2.   The given quantities are     
A) starting velocity
B) final velocity       
C) time
D) acceleration
E) displacement   

 2) The time it takes a car to attain a speed of 30 m/s when accelerating from rest at 2 m/s2 can be found using
A) a = (vf - vo)/t
B) x = v0 + ½ a t
C) vf2 = v02 +2ax


3) The time it takes a car to attain a speed of 30 m/s when accelerating from rest at 2 m/s2 is      
A) (0 m/s - 30 m/s) / (2 m/s2)
B) (30 m/s - 0 m/s) / (2 m/s2).
C) (2 m/s2) / (30 m/s - 0 m/s)
D) (2 m/s2) / (0 m/s - 30 m/s)


4) The time it takes a car to attain a speed of 30 m/s when accelerating from rest at 2 m/s2 is      
A) 60 s.
B) 15 s.
C) 30 s.
D) 2 s.
By making each question an equal step, it helps to highlight the intentional thought process required. Too often, students tell me that they can do the problems as long as I tell them what formula to use.  But, that’s missing the whole point.  The selection of the correct tool is what I’m trying to teach.  Not simply the plugging in of numbers into a calculator.

I imagine that at some point students will complain about having to go through these basics steps, but I’m hoping to slow them down as they attack a problem and ramp up to solving it rather than race to find the final answer.

Are you asking the right questions to get the learning you want?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Twitter Cards for Blogger

By
So, I’ve been seeing people with beautiful Twitter Cards in my Twitter Stream. They make it clear that there is a web page to visit and give a quick preview of what would be found. Something like the one below: I’ve been wondering how to get one of the cards to appear when I tweet out a link to my latest blog post.  Since I use Blogger, there is not a simple button to click to turn this on.  I had to find a way to paste new code into the HTML code of my blog.  It took some searching from multiple sites to get a completely functional.   This site though was quite helpful.  But, I’d like to walk you through my process and hopefully it helps a few out. There are a few types of Twitter Cards.  Two that at most frequently see are the basic summary card and the summary card with large image.  Below you can see the layout of each, but realize that they both have the same content pieces. This is going to look like a lot ...
14 comments
Read more

Personalized Learning Tasks and Roles

By
Yesterday, I read a great post by Jim Rickabaugh dealing with the roles of learner and teacher in a personalized learning environment by looking at tasks . The roles were set up on a continuum. This article timed perfectly with a reflection on part of Students at the Center by Allison Zmuda and Bena Kallick on idea generation and task development I had in mind. These two works are the focus of my reflection here. I think a key misunderstand teachers have when it comes to digging into personalizing learning is that for planning purposes, we no longer begin with standards but with student desires.  I believe like all good instruction, we need to start with the standards.  Think about it, standards are what we want all learners to know and be able to do as a result of passing through our educational system. That is why it is essential that we make sure that standards are representative of what we believe is important for learners to be informed and productive in th...
1 comment
Read more

Pear Deck 101 + Q&A

By
  Last week, I presented as a part of Pear Deck’s Pear Fair 2020. My presentation was Pear Deck 101 for Google Slides. During the presentation, there was a live chat. Many people said it went too fast for a 101 Session. Luckily, it was recorded so it can be rewatched.  Also, many said that they wanted to know how to build a Pear Deck first. I structured the presentation to show what Pear Deck was before showing how to make one. Perhaps that wasn’t the best structure. But, I’m going to stick with my philosophy of showing what something is before showing how to make it. The presentation, which can be watched below, was structured in several different sections What is Pear Deck? Providing an overview of the experience from the Teacher and Student perspectives. How do you build a Pear Deck in Google Slides? How do you start a Pear Deck presentation? How do you end a Pear Deck presentation? Here is the Slideshow I shared during the session bit.ly/pearfair101 Time really flew in...
2 comments
Read more