In my previous school district, I was the only teacher teaching a physics course with set, district-wide learning outcomes. These same outcomes were also taught in physics classrooms at the other high school in our district. But at our school, I was one of the 2 physics teachers. The other teacher taught the AP-level physics courses. So, in many ways, I had opportunities to incorporate strategies I believed were best for learners and that I found worked best for them without being seen as out of alignment with anyone in our building. My amazing friend and one of my teaching philosophy goddesses, Katie Novak, stated the following misconception about alignment: All teachers must deliver instruction in the exact same way. True alignment, she says, is about shared goals, rigor, and outcomes. Thank you, Katie! Katie has taught me to truly believe that learner variability is the rule, not the exception. I encourage you to take 10 minutes to listen to Katie Novak explain it in the ...
I've been looking to address some of the feedback students gave me about term 1 . Specifically in this post I'll address my first steps to try and do something about the lack of connection between standards and content and goals and progress monitoring. The first step I'm taking is to revamp my student progress monitoring process. Previously, I have had students record their progress in a unit on a single Google Doc. I've explained the process in a previous post. I found that process was good for some things, but the reporting of numbers didn't require true depth and the ability to revisit the student created goal. So, I've ditched that model in favor of a document that asks students to report more in depth on each objective identify strengths, room for growth, and a plan for improvement. The idea is to fill this out several times as the unit progresses so that students can reflect on their progress towards objective mastery. This may be do...