In my previous school district, I was the only teacher teaching a physics course with set, district-wide learning outcomes. These same outcomes were also taught in physics classrooms at the other high school in our district. But at our school, I was one of the 2 physics teachers. The other teacher taught the AP-level physics courses. So, in many ways, I had opportunities to incorporate strategies I believed were best for learners and that I found worked best for them without being seen as out of alignment with anyone in our building. My amazing friend and one of my teaching philosophy goddesses, Katie Novak, stated the following misconception about alignment: All teachers must deliver instruction in the exact same way. True alignment, she says, is about shared goals, rigor, and outcomes. Thank you, Katie! Katie has taught me to truly believe that learner variability is the rule, not the exception. I encourage you to take 10 minutes to listen to Katie Novak explain it in the ...
So, you're scrolling through your Twitter feed and come across an interesting headline. You hope to read it later so you like it, flip it, pin it, or email it to yourself. But of course you never get around to reading it. I discovered that the majority of the posts I plan to read come from Edutopia. So I decided to try something this week. For 3 days, I'd spend 20 minutes reading posts directly from Edutopia's site and RSS feed. I limited myself to 20 minutes to see how much I'd get out of it. I was surprised by how many posts I burned through and got great insights from. I've listed some takeaways below: Feedback should focus on effort not simply intelligence. This is feedback for a growth mindset. Space should be given for teachers to try new things and make mistakes and reflect. This is growth mindset for professional development. Am I willing to focus on motivation as a goal for unmotivated students? If so, I have to spend time focusing...